Late term abortion to save a mother’s life is a fallacy.

I get so sick of hearing pro-choice advocates talk about how we need late term abortion in cases where a mother’s life may be in danger. As someone who has a disease where the farther I got into my pregnancies, my health was increasingly at risk, at NO POINT did I ever consider an ABORTION. After a certain period in my pregnancy any attempt to save my life (if necessary and it was) was called an EARLY INDUCTION.

The doctors didn’t need to KILL my babies in order to save MY LIFE.

If a mother’s life is truly in danger, the termination of the baby’s life isn’t the necessary procedure to save hers; the removal of the baby from her body is.  And if that becomes necessary, why wouldn’t we try to save that potentially viable child’s life?

Why is this even a question?

Why does the answer have to be the baby must die?

So my question is: Why are we, as conservatives, not saying this? Why are we allowing the left to claim that late term abortion is necessary and that we must KILL the child in order for the mother to live.  Why are we not saying that after a particular point in a pregnancy, it’s incumbent upon us, as a DECENT and MORAL society to try to save BOTH lives?

Think about it. How many babies are born prematurely and live healthy productive lives after they come home from the hospital?  Thousands.

As a woman who delivered all of her babies early in order to prevent further deterioration of my health, I can’t imagine why any woman wouldn’t at least TRY to save her unborn child’s life.  Maybe the baby wouldn’t survive on it’s own.  Maybe it couldn’t be saved…but at least it was given a chance.  

We need to get real and start being honest about this subject.  There is a VAST difference between terminating your pregnancy at the very beginning stages and terminating it when you have had time to bond and feel it moving in your body.

At 25 weeks+ gestationally a fetus is not a glob of cells.  It’s not some inanimate object that doesn’t feel pain.  It’s a living growing human being. And if you kill  it before you even start the induction process you are robbing that child of it’s right to life.

If you kill it after it’s been born that’s evil.

No matter how much you try to paint it as a choice issue…it’s not.  It’s MURDER plain and simple.

Cindy Chafian-Founder/CEO


Background checks are a Trojan horse to complete gun control…and Republicans are allowing it to happen.


“I don’t consider criminal background checks to be gun control,” Senator Pat Toomey (R) PA said during a press conference at the Capitol. “I think it’s commonsense. If you pass a criminal background check, you get to buy a gun. No problem. It’s the people who fail a criminal or mental health background that we don’t want to have a gun.”


Sounds peachy, right?  Easy peasy…as long as you pass a background check you’re good to go.  The government will allow you exercise your God given right of self-protection.  (Isn’t that so nice of them?!?)


One problem…who’s making the rules for the background checks and are you missing the not so subtle MENTAL HEALTH portion of it?


Of course, it sounds logical that anyone with a history of extreme mental illness wouldn’t be allowed to own a weapon.  Because to most rational law abiding citizens, we think of the types of mental illness that will exclude you from owning a weapon will be the ones that are truly dangerous.


Sociopaths, schizophrenics, truly mentally unstable people who are unable to differentiate between what’s acceptable behavior and what’s not. Of course we want to keep guns out of the hands of CRIMINALS and MAD MEN like Adam Lanza, Jared Loughner, James Holmes or anyone else who are truly mad.  But would background checks have stopped them?  Doubtful and any background checks that might truly stop them will also prevent law abiding citizens from exercising their God given rights.


But what we’re failing to recognize is that the definition of these “mental health” background requirements haven’t been defined are often not limited to the truly mentally unstable.


Questions that American’s need to ask are what is the extent of the mental health background check? What are its limitations?  Will they apply to households or the person who specifically had to deal with the mental illness.


If we’re talking about people who are genuinely ill, then of course, no one thinks that person should be able to own a weapon.  But will it apply to the FAMILY MEMBERS who share a household with that person, as would have been the case with Adam Lanza’s mother.  SHE wasn’t mentally ill…HE WAS.  Do these requirements prevent family members from owning weapons simply because someone close to them is sick?


What about a woman who had just had a baby and is dealing with post-partum depression?  Her doctor prescribes a mood stabilizer to help her get through that period of adjustment.  Technically, that’s a mental disorder.  Will SHE be denied her 2nd Amendment rights because of this temporary state?  What about her husband?  Will he as well, simply because he shares a household with a person with a history of mental illness?


What about members of our military who often have a difficult time dealing with the traumatic situations they endure while serving our country?  If they seek help for PTSD will they be classified as mentally unstable and denied their rights?


If this is the case, then it’s our opinion that not only will this prevent law abiding citizens from exercising their 2nd Amendment rights, it will also deter many people from seeking care for mental health issues when they truly need help simply because they don’t want their rights taken away.  So you run the risk of making the problem of those with mental health issues even worse because they won’t seek help out of fear of having their medical files flagged.   So we end up with MORE cases of people refusing to seek care for their mental health, which leads to a lack of stability, which can ultimately lead to a very bad situation.


So you defeat the purpose of having these checks in place.


Additionally, with the prevalence of mental health struggles in society today, it’s very rare to find a household where no one in the home has gone through a period of struggles where they sought help.  If these background checks are to exclude all members of a household where someone has dealt with mental illness, then gun control has just been implemented because NO ONE will be allowed to obtain weapons.


If the law requiring background checks is allowed to pass the House, then Progressive democrats just won.  Our 2nd Amendment rights will be stripped and law abiding citizens will not be allowed to defend themselves not only from criminals who will stop at nothing to victimize society, but we will also be defenseless against a tyrannical government who imposes their will on the people of a nation regardless of what those citizens want.


This has happened many times over the course of history.  It doesn’t end well for anyone who opposes the government.

“Progressive” Planned Parenthood lobbyist argues for post birth abortion

The video below is a perfect example of why many Americans are against Planned Parenthood.

This is from a hearing in the Florida legislature regarding a bill that would require abortionists to provide medical care to a newborn that survives an abortion.

The Planned Parenthood lobbyist will never come out and say that that child, who has survived the attempted abortion, deserves to live.  Instead she says that their concerns are “logistical issues”.  Really?

This is simply ridiculous and an obvious avoidance on her part to admit that which Planned Parenthood doesn’t want to publicly admit…their position is that that baby should die.

Even in the most rural areas, doctors are trained to save lives.  To say that they won’t support it because it’s an issue of logistics is not only a lie, it’s a disgusting attitude to have toward an innocent child fighting for life.

You see, this is the dark underside of the abortion world that no one, certainly not the reps from Planned Parenthood or any far left women’s groups, want anyone to know about.  They like to act like a woman’s right to choose is only about abortion in the earliest stages of a pregnancy.  That’s it’s all about empowering women and a right to the decisions about her body.  They don’t like to talk about the fact that they think abortion should be available to women whenever then want it…at any stage.  

Nearly half of Americans oppose abortion. The majority of the other half think there should be limitations. Most opposition to abortion stems from the very thing this Planned Parenthood lobbyist is fighting for.  Most level headed Americans don’t think that abortion should be available (short of a life-threatening situation with the mother) after the fetal heartbeat can be detected or the end of the first trimester.  They also don’t think that minors should be to obtain an abortion without their parents consent.  Sadly, the incredibly loud vocal MINORITY are the ones making the most noise so all we hear is their voice—and it’s not even an honest voice.

If being “progressive” means killing babies who are fighting for their life or allowing minors who can’t even take an aspirin at school with permission to obtain a potentially life threatening surgical procedure without their parents even knowing about it, then no thank you.  

This doesn’t sound “progressive” at all…it sounds evil, disgusting and dangerous.

For more information on the Born Alive Infant Protection Act click here.

For information about President Obama’s views on BAIPA, click here.

For more information about abortion accessibility to minors  in your state click here.


The Mommy Lobby is a non-profit group dedicated to keeping moms, who are busy raising their kids, active and engaged about the issues that impact them and their families.

You can find us at

Facebook:  The Mommy Lobby

Twitter: The Mommy Lobby

Affordable Health Care Act program encourages teens to share their sex stories

bedsiderJust when you think that things can’t get any worse, you find out you’re wrong…VERY WRONG.

We’ve come a long way from the sex ed classes we all probably took in middle school that taught us about our bodies functionality.  What our kids are exposed to now is more like a how to book on everything that most of us probably learned WELL into adulthood.  

We recently learned that the Obama administration has allocated millions of dollars in order to implement PREP in local high schools in various states.  (PREP stands for Personal Responsibility Education Program).

 But this particular program is sure to raise the ire of most parents…and for those it doesn’t we have to ask WTH?

Watch this…but not around young ears:

This is a video from the site which is a primary link from the PREP website. It’s about on par with Penthouse Forum and our kids are being encouraged with our tax dollars to download the app and share.  

Whatever happened to telling our kids to WAIT UNTIL MARRIAGE for sex? Or if the don’t want to wait until marriage, is it so wrong to ask them to at least wait until they’re adults and can deal with the responsibilities that come from sexual activity.

We encourage all of you to take some time to familiarize yourself with these pages to fully understand just what our kids are being taught as acceptable and normal.

We’ve gone down a very ugly path in this country regarding sex and what’s normal and acceptable within the confines of a civilized society.  What’s up is down and what’s wrong is right.  Isn’t is time we start to get back to the traditional ideas about maturity and sex instead of teaching our kids that they can have whatever they want, whenever they want and that their actions have no longstanding repercussions?  This is simply not the truth and if we continue down this “no limitations on our desires” attitudes, we, as a society will suffer for it even more than we have.

If it could happen to Rome, what makes us think it can’t happen here?

Program information for PREP as implemented via Affordable Health Care Act can be found here.

Grantees of PREP can be found here.

What can you do?

Share this story.

Get involved.  Become a member and be the first to get our alerts. Sign up here!

Contact your elected officials and demand that programs like this be defunded.  THIS is NOT the type of thing that our tax dollars should be paying for. 

Donate to our efforts to find and fight things like this!  We do the research that keeps busy moms and dads informed!  

We can’t do what we do without your support!  

Please click here or on the thumbs up image below to make a donation to help our efforts!  


Obamacare Funnels $75 Million to Planned Parenthood to Push Sex on Kids

From By Paul Rondeau

While the White House says sequestration has eliminated funds for children touring the White House, President Obama has no problem spending $350 million federal tax dollars for sexual indoctrination programs starting in kindergarten for those same children.

This is not your grandmother’s sex education about how things work and what can go “wrong.” In fact, the exact opposite is the essence of the Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP): Obamacare funnels $75 million annually into PREP, which must be used exclusively for Planned Parenthood-style “comprehensive” sex ed programs where no type of sex is wrong and the only sexual behavior PP considers “unsafe” is becoming pregnant.

More than one-fourth of the funds ‒ $20 million ‒ has been awarded to a coalition of six Planned Parenthood affiliates, operating under the name Northwest Coalition for Adolescent Health, to implement HHS’s TOP program across Montana, Oregon, Idaho, Washington, and Alaska at over 50 sites. In Oregon schools, Planned Parenthood is paying children cash incentives to participate.

PP is funded with our tax dollars to market sex to our children in our schools under the guise of sex education, anti-bullying, diversity, and tolerance. Once sexualized, those children then become PP sex customers for contraceptives, STD testing, and abortion.

“A glance at the teacher outline for Lesson 1A, the introductory lesson (page 12 of the linked PowerPoint presentation), shows exactly how abstinence plays out in the sex-encouraging scheme at Planned Parenthood. ‘Abstinence,’ it says, ‘means choosing not to do any sexual activity that carries a risk for pregnancy or STD/HIV,’” says Rita Diller, national director for “In other words, abstinence has nothing do with abstaining from sex acts. So long as the student avoids STDs and pregnancy, and is comfortable with what he or she is doing, it’s an anything goes.”

Last year Diller’s parent organization, American Life League, released a video titled “Hooking Kids on Sex,” graphically detailing just what Planned Parenthood sex education is. It went viral and was viewed almost one-quarter million times in the first week before a PP activist got YouTube to suspend it. ALL came back with Hooking Kids on Sex (II). Even those who thought they knew Planned Parenthood were shocked.

Click here to READ the rest of the story.

Local Victoria’s Secret protest



VS protest

Many of you are asking how to find out if there are local events in your area.  The Mommy Lobby is helping to bring together citizens who want to show their support for this protest but we are relying on local parents help us out.

We are just getting started with this effort so here’s what we need you to do.

1.) Create a local event on Facebook with the date, time and location for your particular area.

2.) Share the event with everyone you know…ask them to share it.

3.) Email us at  and we’ll put your event in our database that way when someone asks about a local event we don’t duplicate efforts.

4.) Local coordinators can join us on a nationwide conference call to talk about this effort on Tuesday night.  Information about the call will be shared tomorrow.

5.) Keep talking about this issue and take a stand for our children.

6.) If there is already a local event  planned in your area, please share it with your friends.

7.) Sign in below for updates and more information on this effort and our upcoming efforts to protect our kids.



The Mommy Lobby

%d bloggers like this: